<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Forever Geek &#187; Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/tag/applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:59:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Apple iPhone losing its app advantage?</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/01/is_apple_iphone_losing_its_app_advantage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/01/is_apple_iphone_losing_its_app_advantage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=15628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Apple opened up the iPhone to developers and launched the App Store, it was a wake up call, and set a benchmark for other mobile phone manufacturers to aspire to.
Yes, it&#8217;s a much more closed system than the likes of Android, for example, but an iPhone user&#8217;s experience of purchasing apps via iTunes, either [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/iphonenexus.jpg"><img src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/iphonenexus-223x209.jpg" alt="" title="iphonenexus" width="223" height="209" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-15429" /></a>When Apple opened up the iPhone to developers and launched the App Store, it was a wake up call, and set a benchmark for other mobile phone manufacturers to aspire to.</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a much more closed system than the likes of Android, for example, but an iPhone user&#8217;s experience of purchasing apps via iTunes, either from the phone or on a Mac or PC, has still been much better than many other systems.</p>
<p>What has let the side down is the quality of apps available in the Store, made worse by the sheer quantity of them.</p>
<p>New analysis from the Facebook mobile app store Mplayit has found that consumers don&#8217;t really care how many apps a certain platform has, but what they are and whether they&#8217;ll fulfil a certain need.</p>
<p>&#8216;How many apps?&#8217; is the wrong question,&#8221; said Michael Powers, CEO and founder of Mplayit.  &#8220;People just want to get the job done. It doesn&#8217;t matter if there are 50 different to-do list apps on iPhone, because Android or BlackBerry just need a couple of good ones to make consumers happy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps unsurprisingly, apps that can work across various platforms tended to do particularly well in the popularity stakes, with top apps including Evernote (Lists and Notes category) and Pandora Radio (music category).</p>
<p>mPlay it, which uses Facebook to display a range of applications available on each smartphone platform, is aiming at those people who may wish to switch mobile platform without giving up their favourite types of application.</p>
<p>It seems many consumers just want to do a few things on their phone, and to do them well. Sure, us geeks probably tend to examine every aspect of a phone and its software, but the masses maybe care rather less.</p>
<p>Apple may try to convince the general population that there&#8217;s an app for just about anything on the iPhone, but most just aren&#8217;t after that many.</p>
<p>The handset itself is still pretty important. I&#8217;ve used similar apps on an iPhone and a BlackBerry, and let me tell you the BB experience was horrendous. That&#8217;s why manufacturers need to ensure their hardware and interface is as good as it can be so users get a good app experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/01/is_apple_iphone_losing_its_app_advantage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft GeoSynth: like Google Street View but with you doing the hard work</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/microsoft_geosynth_like_google_street_view_but_with_you_doing_the_hard_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/microsoft_geosynth_like_google_street_view_but_with_you_doing_the_hard_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geosynth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photosynth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street view]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=11973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft looks set to continue nipping at Google&#8217;s heels like an annoying little dog by getting you, the humble citizen, to do the hard work and help build Redmond giants answer to Street View.
In fairness, there&#8217;s a lot of technology behind GeoSynth, which will feed a huge range of geotagged photos into a Virtual Earth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/microsoft_logo.gif"><img src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/microsoft_logo-223x52.gif" alt="microsoft_logo" title="microsoft_logo" width="223" height="52" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11975" /></a>Microsoft <a href="http://news.ebrandz.com/microsoft/2009/2517-microsoft-challenges-google-street-view-with-geosynth-.html">looks set</a> to continue nipping at Google&#8217;s heels like an annoying little dog by getting you, the humble citizen, to do the hard work and help build Redmond giants answer to Street View.</p>
<p>In fairness, there&#8217;s a lot of technology behind <strong>GeoSynth</strong>, which will feed a huge range of geotagged photos into a Virtual Earth and PhotoSynth mashup.</p>
<p>Seems the idea is that if enough people take a picture of a particular location, PhotoSynth can build up a pretty realistic digitised version. Stitch thousands of these together and you have something a bit like Street View, except without Microsoft driving around taking photos itself.</p>
<p><span id="more-11973"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;The system would take the best images from a location to create a single image of a specific landmark,&#8221; said a Virtual Earth tech specialist.</p>
<p>Sounds pretty cool if you like the whole concept of street-level views of locations. You&#8217;d probably get some locations (cities, famous landmarks) with a huge amount of photo data while others would be fairly limited, but then Google&#8217;s only really mapping large cities at the street level.</p>
<p>Being able to run a virtual tour of various landmarks just from photographs and without the need for any tags (apart from the geolocation data) is a great idea as this PhotoSynth video demonstrates.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p16frKJLVi0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p16frKJLVi0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/microsoft_geosynth_like_google_street_view_but_with_you_doing_the_hard_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iReddit: iPhone users charged for privilege of accessing Reddit</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-users-charged-for-accessing-reddit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-users-charged-for-accessing-reddit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[280north]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ireddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=11046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm used to seeing plenty in the iPhone app store that I don't think warrants being charged for, so I'm not really surprised that Conde Nast has moved away from free apps - Style.com and Wired Product Reviews, both of which just repackaged existing content in an iPhone-friendly way - to charging for an app - iReddit - that lets you access Reddit.

As you'd expect, the community has something to say about that. Fairly good-natured from what I've read, but then this isn't Digg.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-app.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11050" title="ireddit iphone app" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-app-201x300.jpg" alt="ireddit iphone app" width="201" height="300" /></a>I&#8217;m used to seeing plenty in the iPhone app store that I don&#8217;t think warrants being charged for, so I&#8217;m not really surprised that <strong>Conde Nast</strong> has moved away from free apps &#8211; Style.com and Wired Product Reviews, both of which just repackaged existing content in an iPhone-friendly way &#8211; to charging for an app &#8211; <strong>iReddit</strong> &#8211; that lets you access <a href="http://reddit.com/">Reddit</a>.</p>
<p>As you&#8217;d expect, the community has <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/7y43n/ireddit_the_official_reddit_iphone_app_is_now/c07q0fi">something to say about that</a>. Fairly good-natured from what I&#8217;ve read, but then this isn&#8217;t Digg.</p>
<p>Now the fee ($1.99/&pound;1.19) isn&#8217;t exorbitant &#8211; let&#8217;s face it, you splashed out on an iPhone in the first place &#8211; but it seems a bit strange that there isn&#8217;t a decent web app for the service given that so many other online tools do.</p>
<p><span id="more-11046"></span></p>
<p>Nice bit of marketing with the &#8220;take a picture of yourself with a newspaper and a spoon&#8221; idea but only five people got the benefit of that. Meanwhile, the developer will likely get a headache from everyone who thinks it&#8217;s their right to have a bug-free app because they paid for it. Good luck, <a href="http://280north.com/">280north</a>. Mind you, only one person has posted a review on the iTunes app store so far, which in itself is surprising.</p>
<p>Apparently there&#8217;s going to be a free ad-supported version in the future (called iReddit Lite, perhaps?). What&#8217;s funny is that 280north&#8217;s first application was a <em>browser-based</em> <a href="http://280slides.com/">slide show generator</a>, so they <em>can</em> build them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-users-charged-for-accessing-reddit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mandylion Password Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/mandylion_password_manager_/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/mandylion_password_manager_/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=10894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, show of hands&#8230; and be honest. Who among you uses the same login name and passwords for practically everything? Much worse, who uses &#8220;password&#8221; as your passwords! LOL. There was a time when I was in that vicious circle of keeping everything the same too. Until I read about &#8220;identity theft&#8221; and how seriously [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10895" title="mandylion_manager" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mandylion_manager-214x300.jpg" alt="mandylion_manager" width="214" height="300" />Ok, show of hands&#8230; and be honest. Who among you uses <strong>the same</strong> login name and passwords for practically everything? Much worse, who uses &#8220;password&#8221; as your passwords! LOL. There was a time when I was in that vicious circle of keeping everything the same too. Until I read about &#8220;identity theft&#8221; and how seriously it can harm your credit rating&#8230; moreso, your life.</p>
<p>If remembering passwords have become more than a chore, a torture for you, well&#8230; you may want to think about getting a password manager to help you out. I like my MacBook&#8217;s keychain program as it does wonders for me during my memory blackouts. But still, I cannot bring my Macbook with me always. I need something more portable and less bulky.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/security/91a2/">Mandylion Password Manager </a>is just that. Try it out at Thinkgeek&#8217;s <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/security/91a2/">website </a>for about US$50.</p>
<p><span id="more-10894"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Manages up to 50 login records simultaneously</li>
<li>Generates cryptographically strong passwords</li>
<li>Complies with all DoD, Govt. &amp; Industry Password Security Policies</li>
<li>Multiple tamper-resistant features and lockout alarms</li>
<li>Manages Root and Group passwords</li>
<li>Cradle connection via USB</li>
<li>Kit containing: token, a configuration cradle, Policy Master Configuration Software (Windows only)</li>
<li>Device and software not Mac compatible (sorry)</li>
<li>Dimensions: Approx. 2.5&#8243; x 1.5&#8243; x .375&#8243; (65mm x 45mm x 10mm)</li>
<li>Takes a CR2032 battery (replaceable)</li>
<li>One-year warranty</li>
<li>Windows Vista drivers are available for <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/files/UMP_Driverand__RS232-USB(3rd_party).zip">download</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/mandylion_password_manager_/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9-year-old Creates Hit iPhone App</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/9-year-old_creates_hit_iphone_app/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/9-year-old_creates_hit_iphone_app/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dora</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pascal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=10241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Who would have thought that a kid as young as 9 years old could create an application for the iPhone, much less create one that would be an instant hit?  Well this little boy from Singapore did just that!

Lim Ding Wen is of Malaysian descent and is definitely a prodigy by his own right.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10243" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/_45450940_shapeimage_2-223x167.jpg" alt="_45450940_shapeimage_2" width="154" height="70" /> Who would have thought that a kid as young as 9 years old could create an application for the iPhone, much less create one that would be an instant hit?  Well this little boy from Singapore did just that!</p>
<p><span id="more-10241"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7874291.stm">Lim Ding Wen</a> is of Malaysian descent and is definitely a prodigy by his own right.  At the age of 2, he started using the computer (I think I was only starting to recognise letters at that age!).  He was 7 when he first started programming.  By the time he turned 9, he was already fluent in no less than 6 programming languages! How many do <strong>you</strong> know?</p>
<p>Anyhow, his iPhone app is dubbed<strong> Doodle Kids </strong>and allows iPhone users to draw using their fingers.  Finger painting, if you wish to call it.</p>
<p>So how did he come up with the idea for the app?  He says that he created Doodle Kids for his sisters who love to draw.  He also says that he “is happy that people like it.”  Well, with more than 4,000 downloads from the iTunes store in less than 2 weeks, it does seem that people really like Doodle Kids.</p>
<p>On the technical side, Lim Ding Wen created the program using<strong> Pascal</strong>.  And how long did it take him?  Oh, I don’t know, just a few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/9-year-old_creates_hit_iphone_app/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s friend locator</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/googles_friend_locator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/googles_friend_locator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Location]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/googles_friend_locator/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Something good has come from Google this week, Google Latitude.  It&#8217;s paired with the Google Maps application allowing you to find your friends on the map at any given time.  Scary&#8230; well, maybe.  But don&#8217;t worry, as we know Google, this will be safe.
Google Latitude uses Google Maps My Location service that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google-latitude-map-view2-200x300.jpg" alt="google-latitude-map-view2" width="200" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10294" /></p>
<p>Something good has come from Google this week, Google Latitude.  It&#8217;s paired with the Google Maps application allowing you to find your friends on the map at any given time.  Scary&#8230; well, maybe.  But don&#8217;t worry, as we know Google, this will be safe.</p>
<p>Google Latitude uses Google Maps My Location service that combines cell tower triangulation and GPS.  Ah, too much tech to handle&#8230; well, in a snip, if you have a cellphone AND you allow friends to locate you, you can be found.  There has been tests, that I&#8217;ve personally seen, on the CBS show and I must say it&#8217;s a 50/50 accuracy hit, at least for now.  They tested Google Latitude on a family on a particularly busy and mobile day.  Results were not so good, but brings a promise of improvement!</p>
<p>Oh yeah&#8230; this will work IF your cellphones can access Google Earth by the way.  It will show you an actual map with a few pins on where your friends are (at least those you&#8217;re tracking).  Cool eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/googles_friend_locator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
