<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ForeverGeek &#187; diagram</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/tag/diagram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:42:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Diagram: choosing a secure password</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/02/diagram_choosing_a_secure_password/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/02/diagram_choosing_a_secure_password/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=16294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an interesting diagram that seems to have been created against Google&#8217;s password strength checker. It shows weak, fair, good, strong and &#8220;unbreakable&#8221; passwords, as might be created by teenagers, douches (you work that one out), geeks, nature lovers, professionals, and &#8220;normal&#8221; people. Who&#8217;s normal? Interesting that &#8216;g01111001110011101100e&#8217; — of which the central zeroes and one form five-digit binary groups each referring to a letter position in the alphabet, and actually form the password &#8216;goggle&#8217; (not &#8216;google&#8217;, ha-ha) — is deemed &#8220;unbreakable&#8221;. I doubt it is, but I wonder how many geeks would choose a password along these lines? Not strong enough for my liking, but it&#8217;s way better than]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting diagram that seems to have been created against Google&#8217;s password strength checker.</p>
<p>It shows weak, fair, good, strong and &#8220;unbreakable&#8221; passwords, as might be created by teenagers, douches (you work that one out), geeks, nature lovers, professionals, and &#8220;normal&#8221; people.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s normal?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/strong_passwords_diagram.jpg"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/strong_passwords_diagram-540x701.jpg" alt="strong passwords diagram 540x701 Diagram: choosing a secure password" title="strong_passwords_diagram" width="540" height="701" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-16295" /></a></p>
<p>Interesting that &#8216;g01111001110011101100e&#8217; — of which the central zeroes and one form five-digit binary groups each referring to a letter position in the alphabet, and actually form the password &#8216;goggle&#8217; (not &#8216;google&#8217;, ha-ha) — is deemed &#8220;unbreakable&#8221;. I doubt it is, but I wonder how many geeks would choose a password along these lines? Not strong enough for my liking, but it&#8217;s way better than &#8220;rockstar&#8221; and &#8220;iloveu&#8221;.</p>
<p>What we don&#8217;t have on here are the expletive-laden passwords that I know for a fact many people often use.</p>
<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&#038;tl=en&#038;u=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.hipertextual.com%2F%7Er%2Falt1040%2F%7E3%2FqMGkaPLQxjE%2Fseguridad-contrasenas">Via</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/02/diagram_choosing_a_secure_password/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet mapped using Tokyo subway model</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/06/internet_mapped_using_tokyo_subway_model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/06/internet_mapped_using_tokyo_subway_model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tokyo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=13236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a look at the amazing diagram below. It&#8217;s a 333-strong selection of the world&#8217;s top web sites portrayed on the Tokyo subway map layout. Apparently this is the fourth version of the map though I hadn&#8217;t seen it before &#8211; wish I had. As you&#8217;d expect, all the big boys are on there — Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Skype, StumbleUpon, WordPress, Reddit, IMDb&#8230; There&#8217;s a lot of media there too including News Corp, BBC, The Guardian and so on. It&#8217;s well worth spending time scrolling around looking at how sites are linked up together and who the key players are. The taller the building, the more successful it&#8217;s deemed,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at the amazing diagram below. It&#8217;s a 333-strong selection of the world&#8217;s top web sites portrayed on the Tokyo subway map layout.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/internet-tokyo-subway-map.png"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/internet-tokyo-subway-map-540x381.png" alt="internet tokyo subway map 540x381 Internet mapped using Tokyo subway model" title="internet-tokyo-subway-map" width="540" height="381" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-13235" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.idsgn.org/posts/mapping-the-internet/">Apparently</a> this is the fourth version of the map though I hadn&#8217;t seen it before &#8211; wish I had.</p>
<p><span id="more-13236"></span></p>
<p>As you&#8217;d expect, all the big boys are on there — Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Skype, StumbleUpon, WordPress, Reddit, IMDb&#8230;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of media there too including News Corp, BBC, The Guardian and so on.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s well worth spending time scrolling around looking at how sites are linked up together and who the key players are.</p>
<p>The taller the building, the more successful it&#8217;s deemed, while its width denotes how stable it is.</p>
<p>See the full sized map <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/formforce/3409362834/sizes/o/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/06/internet_mapped_using_tokyo_subway_model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

