<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ForeverGeek &#187; geosynth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/tag/geosynth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:42:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft GeoSynth: like Google Street View but with you doing the hard work</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/microsoft_geosynth_like_google_street_view_but_with_you_doing_the_hard_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/microsoft_geosynth_like_google_street_view_but_with_you_doing_the_hard_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geosynth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photosynth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=11973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft looks set to continue nipping at Google&#8217;s heels like an annoying little dog by getting you, the humble citizen, to do the hard work and help build Redmond giants answer to Street View. In fairness, there&#8217;s a lot of technology behind GeoSynth, which will feed a huge range of geotagged photos into a Virtual Earth and PhotoSynth mashup. Seems the idea is that if enough people take a picture of a particular location, PhotoSynth can build up a pretty realistic digitised version. Stitch thousands of these together and you have something a bit like Street View, except without Microsoft driving around taking photos itself. &#8220;The system would take the]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/microsoft_logo.gif"><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/microsoft_logo-223x52.gif" alt="microsoft logo 223x52 Microsoft GeoSynth: like Google Street View but with you doing the hard work" title="microsoft_logo" width="223" height="52" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11975" /></a>Microsoft <a href="http://news.ebrandz.com/microsoft/2009/2517-microsoft-challenges-google-street-view-with-geosynth-.html">looks set</a> to continue nipping at Google&#8217;s heels like an annoying little dog by getting you, the humble citizen, to do the hard work and help build Redmond giants answer to Street View.</p>
<p>In fairness, there&#8217;s a lot of technology behind <strong>GeoSynth</strong>, which will feed a huge range of geotagged photos into a Virtual Earth and PhotoSynth mashup.</p>
<p>Seems the idea is that if enough people take a picture of a particular location, PhotoSynth can build up a pretty realistic digitised version. Stitch thousands of these together and you have something a bit like Street View, except without Microsoft driving around taking photos itself.</p>
<p><span id="more-11973"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;The system would take the best images from a location to create a single image of a specific landmark,&#8221; said a Virtual Earth tech specialist.</p>
<p>Sounds pretty cool if you like the whole concept of street-level views of locations. You&#8217;d probably get some locations (cities, famous landmarks) with a huge amount of photo data while others would be fairly limited, but then Google&#8217;s only really mapping large cities at the street level.</p>
<p>Being able to run a virtual tour of various landmarks just from photographs and without the need for any tags (apart from the geolocation data) is a great idea as this PhotoSynth video demonstrates.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p16frKJLVi0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p16frKJLVi0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/microsoft_geosynth_like_google_street_view_but_with_you_doing_the_hard_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

