<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Forever Geek &#187; ireddit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/tag/ireddit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iReddit: iPhone users charged for privilege of accessing Reddit</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-users-charged-for-accessing-reddit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-users-charged-for-accessing-reddit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[280north]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ireddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=11046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm used to seeing plenty in the iPhone app store that I don't think warrants being charged for, so I'm not really surprised that Conde Nast has moved away from free apps - Style.com and Wired Product Reviews, both of which just repackaged existing content in an iPhone-friendly way - to charging for an app - iReddit - that lets you access Reddit.

As you'd expect, the community has something to say about that. Fairly good-natured from what I've read, but then this isn't Digg.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-app.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11050" title="ireddit iphone app" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-app-201x300.jpg" alt="ireddit iphone app" width="201" height="300" /></a>I&#8217;m used to seeing plenty in the iPhone app store that I don&#8217;t think warrants being charged for, so I&#8217;m not really surprised that <strong>Conde Nast</strong> has moved away from free apps &#8211; Style.com and Wired Product Reviews, both of which just repackaged existing content in an iPhone-friendly way &#8211; to charging for an app &#8211; <strong>iReddit</strong> &#8211; that lets you access <a href="http://reddit.com/">Reddit</a>.</p>
<p>As you&#8217;d expect, the community has <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/7y43n/ireddit_the_official_reddit_iphone_app_is_now/c07q0fi">something to say about that</a>. Fairly good-natured from what I&#8217;ve read, but then this isn&#8217;t Digg.</p>
<p>Now the fee ($1.99/&pound;1.19) isn&#8217;t exorbitant &#8211; let&#8217;s face it, you splashed out on an iPhone in the first place &#8211; but it seems a bit strange that there isn&#8217;t a decent web app for the service given that so many other online tools do.</p>
<p><span id="more-11046"></span></p>
<p>Nice bit of marketing with the &#8220;take a picture of yourself with a newspaper and a spoon&#8221; idea but only five people got the benefit of that. Meanwhile, the developer will likely get a headache from everyone who thinks it&#8217;s their right to have a bug-free app because they paid for it. Good luck, <a href="http://280north.com/">280north</a>. Mind you, only one person has posted a review on the iTunes app store so far, which in itself is surprising.</p>
<p>Apparently there&#8217;s going to be a free ad-supported version in the future (called iReddit Lite, perhaps?). What&#8217;s funny is that 280north&#8217;s first application was a <em>browser-based</em> <a href="http://280slides.com/">slide show generator</a>, so they <em>can</em> build them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-users-charged-for-accessing-reddit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
