<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ForeverGeek &#187; Mac OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/tag/mac_os_x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:42:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Windows, OS X, Linux all the same for one thing&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/07/windows_os_x_linux_all_the_same_for_one_thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/07/windows_os_x_linux_all_the_same_for_one_thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=13407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahh, how much time we used to still spend arguing over which is better: Windows, Mac OS X or Linux. Seems that the following graph, though not comprehensive, arrives at one stark conclusion: your choice of operating system is irrelevant when it comes to&#8230; &#8230;watching porn: Via]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, how much time we <strike>used to</strike> still spend arguing over which is better: Windows, Mac OS X or Linux.</p>
<p>Seems that the following graph, though not comprehensive, arrives at one stark conclusion: your choice of operating system is irrelevant when it comes to&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;watching porn:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/operating-system-usability-for-porn.gif"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/operating-system-usability-for-porn.gif" alt="operating system usability for porn Windows, OS X, Linux all the same for one thing..." title="operating-system-usability-for-porn" width="500" height="505" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13408" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yougeek.net/y-al-final-usamos-linux-mac-y-windows-para-lo-mismo/">Via</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/07/windows_os_x_linux_all_the_same_for_one_thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac vs. Windows &#8211; It&#039;s All About The &quot;Maximize&quot; Button</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/09/mac_vs_windows_its_all_about_the_maximize_button/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/09/mac_vs_windows_its_all_about_the_maximize_button/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. Angelo Racoma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=3438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris argues over at restiffbard.com that the fundamental difference between Windows and Mac users lies not so much in the user interface in general, but only certain specific characteristics of the UI. In particular, it&#8217;s all about the &#8220;maximize&#8221; button and how it affects the user&#8217;s workflow. In Windows, the big rectangular box would maximize a window, causing it to take up all space on the screen except for the taskbar. In Mac OS X, the green &#8220;+&#8221; button would simply resize the current window to its optimal width and height, taking into consideration the current window contents. Because it is a simple matter for a OS X user to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="mac vs win Mac vs. Windows   It&#039;s All About The &quot;Maximize&quot; Button" src="http://forevergeek.com/images/mac-vs-win.jpg" width="124" height="99" style="padding: 5px; float: right;" title="Mac vs. Windows   It&#039;s All About The &quot;Maximize&quot; Button" /><br />
Chris argues over at <a href="http://restiffbard.com">restiffbard.com</a> that the fundamental difference between Windows and Mac users lies not so much in the user interface in general, but only certain specific characteristics of the UI. In particular, it&#8217;s all about the &#8220;maximize&#8221; button and how it affects the user&#8217;s workflow. In Windows, the big rectangular box would maximize a window, causing it to take up all space on the screen except for the taskbar. In Mac OS X, the green &#8220;+&#8221; button would simply resize the current window to its optimal width and height, taking into consideration the current window contents.</p>
<blockquote><p>Because it is a simple matter for a OS X user to increase the width of their browser on a case by case basis there is never a need to stretch to full screen. The button that most Windows people assume will expand a window to full screen instead, in OS X, expands or contracts to the documents dimensions. In the case of a browser it expands and contracts to the width of the web page.</p>
<p>In windows, there is no easy way to contract a window view. So, rather than jumping back and forth between window sizes a Windows person would just go full screen and stay there.</p></blockquote>
<p>So in this case, the Mac user would be used to multitasking, with the slew of windows visible on the desktop, overlapping, and sometimes just peeking from behind the foreground window. The Windows user, on the other hand, tends to work solely on the current window visible in the foreground.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m both a Mac and Windows user, and I usually work on my Mac and Windows laptops side by side (each with their particular purposes). I&#8217;ve reached the point where I no longer get confused when I switch across the Mac and Windows interfaces. And guess what. I don&#8217;t usually maximize my Windows! Even before I started using a Mac, I never got used to maximizing. I always preferred having my Windows overlapping, with some peeking just behind the active window I&#8217;m currently working on.</p>
<h3>A Workflow Issue</h3>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a workflow issue. Having a window maximized has advantages, since this lets the user focus on the single task at hand. But having all your windows&#8211;or parts thereof&#8211;visible at all times (let&#8217;s not even mention ExposÃ©) can also help in seeing the bigger picture.</p>
<p>Still, one has to consider that the human brain was <a href="http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2006/03/multitasking_ma.html">not designed for multitasking</a>. So it&#8217;s a question of productivity. Do you work (or play) better when you have a good grasp of the overall picture? Or do you need to be constantly focused on one thing?</p>
<p>Perhaps more interesting and intriguing with the restiffbard.com article is the reader discussion that ensues. There&#8217;s the Mac camp, and there&#8217;s the Windows camp, and there are the people that see things more objectively. Going beyond the My-OS-is-better-than-your-OS arguments, though, it&#8217;s really a matter of how effectively the machine can interface with the human. Both sides have advantages. And considering that Windows still has majority share in the world&#8217;s consumer OS market, how effective a UI may no longer be inherent in the operating system&#8217;s design. The Mac cult may argue about their&#8217;s being superior. But in the end, It&#8217;s about preference. It&#8217;s about user adoption. This is why some people still find it difficult to switch across platforms.</p>
<p>What about you? What&#8217;s your OS and what&#8217;s your preference in dealing with window sizes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/09/mac_vs_windows_its_all_about_the_maximize_button/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quinn &#8211; Tetris for Mac OS X is Back</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/08/quinn_tetris_for_mac_os_x_is_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/08/quinn_tetris_for_mac_os_x_is_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AlexTan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tetris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=3348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quinn. Possibly the best tetris client ever made. A couple weeks ago The Tetris Company forced Simon Haertel to stop the distribution of Quinn and threatened legal action. After seeking legal Advice, Haertel removed all mentions of tetris from his website and instead calls it an &#8220;implementation of a popular falling-blocks game&#8221;. The app uses amazing graphics, and has great networking features allowing you to play with friends over bonjour or over the internet. I&#8217;m glad to see that Quinn is back in development and is once again open to the public. Quinn Official Website Direct Download (2.7 MB)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quinn. Possibly the best tetris client ever made. A couple weeks ago The Tetris Company forced Simon Haertel to stop the distribution of Quinn and threatened legal action. After seeking legal Advice, Haertel removed all mentions of tetris from his website and instead calls it an &#8220;implementation of a popular falling-blocks game&#8221;. The app uses amazing graphics, and has great networking features allowing you to play with friends over bonjour or over the internet. I&#8217;m glad to see that Quinn is back in development and is once again open to the public.</p>
<div class="screenshot"><img alt="susumuquinnreplacement Quinn   Tetris for Mac OS X is Back" src="http://forevergeek.com/images/susumuquinnreplacement.png" width="128" height="128" title="Quinn   Tetris for Mac OS X is Back" /></div>
<p><strong>Quinn</strong><br />
<a href="http://simonhaertel.de/">Official Website</a><br />
<a href="http://www.simonhaertel.de/download/quinn-current">Direct Download (2.7 MB)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/08/quinn_tetris_for_mac_os_x_is_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 Cool Things You can do with Growl on OS X</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/2_cool_things_you_can_do_with_growl_on_os_x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/2_cool_things_you_can_do_with_growl_on_os_x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AlexTan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forevergeek.com/?p=2647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who are Mac-heads like myself, I&#8217;ve found a great, lightweight, background application that increases the OS X experience. That application is called Growl. I know, I know, Growl has been around for a while but there are many people who don&#8217;t know about it. Growl works like this, once it&#8217;s installed there is a System Preference panel which allows you to change the settings. Many developers build their applications to work natively with Growl, as can be seen here in this list. Download Growl before doing any of these steps, here. Notifications like this appear in the top right of your screen using Growl 1. Find]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who are Mac-heads like myself, I&#8217;ve found a great, lightweight, background application that increases the OS X experience. That application is called Growl. I know, I know, Growl has been around for a while but there are many people who don&#8217;t know about it. Growl works like this, once it&#8217;s installed there is a System Preference panel which allows you to change the settings. Many developers build their applications to work natively with Growl, as can be seen here in <a href="http://growl.info/applications.php">this list</a>. Download Growl before doing any of these steps, <a href="http://growl.info/files/Growl-0.7.4.dmg">here</a>.</p>
<div class="screenshot"><img alt="growl 2 Cool Things You can do with Growl on OS X" src="http://forevergeek.com/images/growl.png" width="286" height="113" title="2 Cool Things You can do with Growl on OS X" /></div>
<blockquote><p>Notifications like this appear in the top right of your screen using Growl</p></blockquote>
<p>1. <strong>Find Out When Macs Log onto your Network</strong></p>
<p>Using a combination of the open-source FTP client <a href="http://cyberduck.ch/">Cyberduck</a> and Growl you can find out when other computers running Mac OS X log onto your computer. I use this when I&#8217;m in public areas, it&#8217;s just fun to see when someone is opening or starting up their computer.</p>
<p>Step 1. Download Cyberduck<br />
Step 2. Open Cyberduck, and keep it running.<br />
Step 3. Wait for someone to open their Mac and a Growl notification to appear in the top right corner.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Become notified when a new iTunes song Plays</strong></p>
<p>Using <a href="http://growl.info/documentation/growltunes.php">GrowlTunes</a> and iTunes, Growl will notify you of when the song changes and what song that it is changing to.</p>
<p>Step 1. Install GrowlTunes from the Growl Disk image (it&#8217;s bundled)<br />
Step 2. Open iTunes and listen to music.</p>
<p>I think in the future, more developers will begin building Growl into their applications, or maybe Apple will incorporate a similar feature in Mac OS X: Leopard.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/apple/Mac_OS_X:_Growl_Notifies_you_of_Application_Changes">Digg this Story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2006/02/2_cool_things_you_can_do_with_growl_on_os_x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

