<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ForeverGeek &#187; reddit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/tag/reddit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:42:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Browseristas: If Browsers Were Fashionistas</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2011/09/browseristas-if-browsers-were-fashionistas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2011/09/browseristas-if-browsers-were-fashionistas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noemi Twigg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=37198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some time last year, I shared a simple infographic showing the link between women and web browsers. Remember Firefox, the woman who gets so deep under your skin that you can&#8217;t get rid of her in spite of all the flaws? Then there is Opera, who is slim, sexy, and yet tough at the same time. Mac users will always stand up for Safari, the hottie who lets her friends in without necessarily informing you. And who can overlook Chrome, the skinny, but cool and friendly gal who, unfortunately, does not have much to offer. Last, but not the least, we have Internet Explorer who has shared a lot of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some time last year, I shared a simple infographic showing the link between <a title="If Women Were Browsers Infographic" href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/07/if_women_were_browsers_infographic/">women and web browsers</a>. Remember Firefox, the woman who gets so deep under your skin that you can&#8217;t get rid of her in spite of all the flaws? Then there is Opera, who is slim, sexy, and yet tough at the same time. Mac users will always stand up for Safari, the hottie who lets her friends in without necessarily informing you. And who can overlook Chrome, the skinny, but cool and friendly gal who, unfortunately, does not have much to offer. Last, but not the least, we have Internet Explorer who has shared a lot of experiences with everyone and poses some danger with regard to infection. (The situation may have improved with IE with the recent updates, though.)</p>
<p>This browser war is far from over. Even with more browsers coming into the picture, the main players just hog the limelight pretty much all the time. And for some reason, people tend to liken the browsers to the fairer sex.</p>
<p>Enter artist Moie Preisenberger (also known as Eskimoie, how cute is that?) who has put a different spin on the link between browsers and women. (Oh the things you find on <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/kceg9/browseristas_browsers_as_painted_ladies/">Reddit</a>!) His creation is a drawing that gives us a visual representation of how browsers would look like if they were women who are always on the cutting edge of fashion. The result? Browseristas. Not exactly the most creative term, but I think it works pretty well given the words and ideas involved.</p>
<div id="attachment_37200" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 514px;  border: 1px solid #dddddd; background-color: #f3f3f3; padding-top: 4px; margin: 10px; text-align:center; display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;"><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/2011/09/browseristas-if-browsers-were-fashionistas/browseristas/" rel="attachment wp-att-37200"><img class="size-large wp-image-37200 " title="Browseristas" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/media/2011/09/Browseristas-930x758.jpg" alt="Browseristas 930x758 Browseristas: If Browsers Were Fashionistas" width="504" height="410" /></a><p style=' padding: 0 4px 5px; margin: 0;'  class="wp-caption-text">Browseristas</p></div>
<p>Once again, we have the five main players: Firefox, Opera, Internet Explorer, Chrome, and Safari. As browsers go, I will continue to stand by my usual suspects &#8211; Safari, Firefox, and Chrome (in decreasing order of preference). Looking at Eskimoie&#8217;s lovely ladies, though, I have to admit that Lady Internet Explorer seems to be the most alluring of the five, with Chrome coming in a close second (except I don&#8217;t like her dress).</p>
<p>Then again, I am no fashionista, so I might be seeing it all wrong. What do you think about the Browseristas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2011/09/browseristas-if-browsers-were-fashionistas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Awesome Halloween Pumpkin Carvings For Geeks</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/10/awesome_halloween_pumpkin_carvings_for_geeks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/10/awesome_halloween_pumpkin_carvings_for_geeks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noemi Twigg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halloween]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pumpkin carvings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=14338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who said geeks don’t celebrate Halloween? I am willing to bet a month’s salary (not much, I have to admit) that there will be countless Spocks, Darth Vaders, and other similar characters at parties this weekend. But have you ever thought of carving that pumpkin based on the current social media trends? I honestly haven’t, but the guys at Mashable did an excellent job featuring 12 of the coolest social media pumpkin carvings for Halloween. You should check the full article out, but here’s a tiny glimpse of what’s in store for you. Needless to say, they’re the ones that made my blood flow more quickly. Twitter’s Fail Whale –]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said geeks don’t celebrate Halloween?  I am willing to bet a month’s salary (not much, I have to admit) that there will be countless Spocks, Darth Vaders, and other similar characters at parties this weekend.  But have you ever thought of carving that pumpkin based on the current social media trends?  I honestly haven’t, but the guys at <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/10/28/halloween-pumpkin-carvings/">Mashable did an excellent job featuring 12 of the coolest social media pumpkin carvings for Halloween</a>.</p>
<p>You should check the full article out, but here’s a tiny glimpse of what’s in store for you.  Needless to say, they’re the ones that made my blood flow more quickly.<br />
<span id="more-14338"></span><br />
<strong>Twitter’s Fail Whale </strong>– who does not recognize this creature?  Twitter has received a lot of flak for its intermittent service, although we have to admit is has become much better.  Still, the fail whale has earned its place in history.<br />
<img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-14339" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/failwhale-pumpkin1-300x225-223x167.jpg" alt="failwhale pumpkin1 300x225 223x167 Awesome Halloween Pumpkin Carvings For Geeks" width="223" height="167" title="Awesome Halloween Pumpkin Carvings For Geeks" /><br />
<strong>Firefox and IE</strong> – I use Chrome now since Firefox started to crash on me all the time about a month ago, and I haven’t used IE since forever, but these pumpkins still look awesome, don’t they?<br />
<img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-14340" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/firefox-ie-pumpkin-223x126.jpg" alt="firefox ie pumpkin 223x126 Awesome Halloween Pumpkin Carvings For Geeks" width="223" height="126" title="Awesome Halloween Pumpkin Carvings For Geeks" /><br />
<strong>Reddit</strong> – I love how they used a reddish hue for the lighting inside the pumpkin.  This alien is cuter than ET, in my opinion.<br />
<img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-14341" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/reddit-pumpkin-223x110.jpg" alt="reddit pumpkin 223x110 Awesome Halloween Pumpkin Carvings For Geeks" width="223" height="110" title="Awesome Halloween Pumpkin Carvings For Geeks" /><br />
<strong>Apple</strong> – of course.  I could have thought of this myself if I didn’t see Mashable’s write up first (yeah right).  A geek pumpkin fest will not be complete without an Apple carving, don’t you think?  Maybe you can use Steve Job’s face for a more unique carving?<br />
<img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-14342" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/apple-pumpkin-223x167.jpg" alt="apple pumpkin 223x167 Awesome Halloween Pumpkin Carvings For Geeks" width="223" height="167" title="Awesome Halloween Pumpkin Carvings For Geeks" /></p>
<p><em>All photos courtesy of Mashable</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/10/awesome_halloween_pumpkin_carvings_for_geeks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iReddit: iPhone users charged for privilege of accessing Reddit</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-users-charged-for-accessing-reddit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-users-charged-for-accessing-reddit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[280north]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=11046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm used to seeing plenty in the iPhone app store that I don't think warrants being charged for, so I'm not really surprised that Conde Nast has moved away from free apps - Style.com and Wired Product Reviews, both of which just repackaged existing content in an iPhone-friendly way - to charging for an app - iReddit - that lets you access Reddit.

As you'd expect, the community has something to say about that. Fairly good-natured from what I've read, but then this isn't Digg.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-app.jpg"><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11050" title="ireddit iphone app" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-app-201x300.jpg" alt="ireddit iphone app 201x300 iReddit: iPhone users charged for privilege of accessing Reddit" width="201" height="300" /></a>I&#8217;m used to seeing plenty in the iPhone app store that I don&#8217;t think warrants being charged for, so I&#8217;m not really surprised that <strong>Conde Nast</strong> has moved away from free apps &#8211; Style.com and Wired Product Reviews, both of which just repackaged existing content in an iPhone-friendly way &#8211; to charging for an app &#8211; <strong>iReddit</strong> &#8211; that lets you access <a href="http://reddit.com/">Reddit</a>.</p>
<p>As you&#8217;d expect, the community has <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/7y43n/ireddit_the_official_reddit_iphone_app_is_now/c07q0fi">something to say about that</a>. Fairly good-natured from what I&#8217;ve read, but then this isn&#8217;t Digg.</p>
<p>Now the fee ($1.99/&pound;1.19) isn&#8217;t exorbitant &#8211; let&#8217;s face it, you splashed out on an iPhone in the first place &#8211; but it seems a bit strange that there isn&#8217;t a decent web app for the service given that so many other online tools do.</p>
<p><span id="more-11046"></span></p>
<p>Nice bit of marketing with the &#8220;take a picture of yourself with a newspaper and a spoon&#8221; idea but only five people got the benefit of that. Meanwhile, the developer will likely get a headache from everyone who thinks it&#8217;s their right to have a bug-free app because they paid for it. Good luck, <a href="http://280north.com/">280north</a>. Mind you, only one person has posted a review on the iTunes app store so far, which in itself is surprising.</p>
<p>Apparently there&#8217;s going to be a free ad-supported version in the future (called iReddit Lite, perhaps?). What&#8217;s funny is that 280north&#8217;s first application was a <em>browser-based</em> <a href="http://280slides.com/">slide show generator</a>, so they <em>can</em> build them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/ireddit-iphone-users-charged-for-accessing-reddit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

