<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ForeverGeek &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forevergeek.com/tag/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forevergeek.com</link>
	<description>Nerds are for Dorks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:42:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>How Strong Are Your Passwords?</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/04/how_strong_are_your_passwords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/04/how_strong_are_your_passwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noemi Twigg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=17181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you pay as much attention to your passwords as you need to? I will have to be honest and say that I probably need to be more vigilant in this regard. For the time that I spend online and all the sites that I gain secure access to, I do not really put that high of a priority in strong passwords. What I read today has made me think really hard, though. John Pozadzides, Internet standards expert, CEO of web company iFusion Labs, and blogger recently published an article titled “How I’d Hack Your Weak Passwords.” What he revealed is striking, to say the least. We all know that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you pay as much attention to your passwords as you need to?  I will have to be honest and say that I probably need to be more vigilant in this regard.  For the time that I spend online and all the sites that I gain secure access to, I do not really put that high of a priority in strong passwords.  What I read today has made me think really hard, though.</p>
<p>John Pozadzides, Internet standards expert, CEO of web company iFusion Labs, and blogger recently published an article titled “How I’d Hack Your Weak Passwords.”  What he revealed is striking, to say the least.</p>
<p>We all know that the longer the password, the better.  Combining letters and numbers is even better.  Using a mixture of lowercase letters and capital letters is another way to strengthen your password.  We KNOW all these things.  But, did you know just how much of a difference using ONE capital letter in your password can make?  Check out this table below.  It shows the time an average computer will need to figure out the password for an account using certain programs (which, by the way, can be found FREE online!).<br />
<a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/?attachment_id=17182"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-17182" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/media/2010/04/500x_password_hacking_times-1.jpg" alt="500x password hacking times 1 How Strong Are Your Passwords?" width="500" height="267" title="How Strong Are Your Passwords?" /></a><br />
With this in mind, I wouldn’t be surprised if you start changing your passwords now.  I suggest that you read the full article as it provides more specific information on how to make your passwords stronger.  Passwords are your first (and oftentimes last) line of defense, and yet sometimes, they are taken for granted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/04/how_strong_are_your_passwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Careless laptop users emitting Wi-Fi and alerting thieves</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/03/careless_laptop_users_emitting_wi-fi_and_alerting_thieves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/03/careless_laptop_users_emitting_wi-fi_and_alerting_thieves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=16502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the latest warning issued by a security specialist is that of turning off your Wi-Fi connection before hibernating your notebook PC. According to Credant Technologies, some users are unwittingly advertising the location of their laptop to anyone with a cheap off-the-shelf handheld wireless signal detector. Apparently one of the global hotspots for this kind of theft is Jamaica, but the crime could easily be committed anywhere else. Something I wasn&#8217;t aware of (and is rather worrying in its own right) is that some notebook PCs can stay awake for up to 30 minutes even after the lid is shut. Quite why this is necessary (unless it&#8217;s deliberately set]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/samsung-n310-notebook.jpg"><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/samsung-n310-notebook-223x198.jpg" alt="samsung n310 notebook 223x198 Careless laptop users emitting Wi Fi and alerting thieves" title="samsung-n310-notebook" width="223" height="198" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11925" /></a>One of the latest warning issued by a security specialist is that of turning off your Wi-Fi connection before hibernating your notebook PC.</p>
<p>According to Credant Technologies, some users are unwittingly advertising the location of their laptop to anyone with a cheap off-the-shelf handheld wireless signal detector.</p>
<p>Apparently one of the global hotspots for this kind of theft is Jamaica, but the crime could easily be committed anywhere else.</p>
<p>Something I wasn&#8217;t aware of (and is rather worrying in its own right) is that some notebook PCs can stay awake for up to 30 minutes even after the lid is shut. Quite why this is necessary (unless it&#8217;s deliberately set by the user) is a little unclear.</p>
<p>Anyway, the message is clear: turn your Wi-Fi off when you&#8217;re not using your laptop to reduce the risk of thieves locating and stealing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/03/careless_laptop_users_emitting_wi-fi_and_alerting_thieves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diagram: choosing a secure password</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/02/diagram_choosing_a_secure_password/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/02/diagram_choosing_a_secure_password/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=16294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an interesting diagram that seems to have been created against Google&#8217;s password strength checker. It shows weak, fair, good, strong and &#8220;unbreakable&#8221; passwords, as might be created by teenagers, douches (you work that one out), geeks, nature lovers, professionals, and &#8220;normal&#8221; people. Who&#8217;s normal? Interesting that &#8216;g01111001110011101100e&#8217; — of which the central zeroes and one form five-digit binary groups each referring to a letter position in the alphabet, and actually form the password &#8216;goggle&#8217; (not &#8216;google&#8217;, ha-ha) — is deemed &#8220;unbreakable&#8221;. I doubt it is, but I wonder how many geeks would choose a password along these lines? Not strong enough for my liking, but it&#8217;s way better than]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting diagram that seems to have been created against Google&#8217;s password strength checker.</p>
<p>It shows weak, fair, good, strong and &#8220;unbreakable&#8221; passwords, as might be created by teenagers, douches (you work that one out), geeks, nature lovers, professionals, and &#8220;normal&#8221; people.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s normal?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/strong_passwords_diagram.jpg"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/strong_passwords_diagram-540x701.jpg" alt="strong passwords diagram 540x701 Diagram: choosing a secure password" title="strong_passwords_diagram" width="540" height="701" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-16295" /></a></p>
<p>Interesting that &#8216;g01111001110011101100e&#8217; — of which the central zeroes and one form five-digit binary groups each referring to a letter position in the alphabet, and actually form the password &#8216;goggle&#8217; (not &#8216;google&#8217;, ha-ha) — is deemed &#8220;unbreakable&#8221;. I doubt it is, but I wonder how many geeks would choose a password along these lines? Not strong enough for my liking, but it&#8217;s way better than &#8220;rockstar&#8221; and &#8220;iloveu&#8221;.</p>
<p>What we don&#8217;t have on here are the expletive-laden passwords that I know for a fact many people often use.</p>
<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&#038;tl=en&#038;u=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.hipertextual.com%2F%7Er%2Falt1040%2F%7E3%2FqMGkaPLQxjE%2Fseguridad-contrasenas">Via</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/02/diagram_choosing_a_secure_password/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is social networking less safe, or are users more stupid?</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/02/is_social_networking_less_safe_or_are_users_more_stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/02/is_social_networking_less_safe_or_are_users_more_stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=16025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The summary of a new report into online security, the full version of which will be available tomorrow, suggest that social networks are less safe than a year ago. However, I am wondering if the fact is that the collection of its users are just more careless / stupid. Security firm Sophos reckons there has been a 70% rise in attacks on social network sites, while nearly three out of four companies think workers&#8217; behaviour online puts their business at risk. Three out of five users say they have been spammed via social networking sites, while one in three says they&#8217;ve been sent malware: both up around 70% on last]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/media/2007/10/facebook.jpg"><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/media/2007/10/facebook.jpg" alt="facebook Is social networking less safe, or are users more stupid?" title="facebook.jpg" width="317" height="204" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-6529" /></a>The summary of a new report into online security, the full version of which will be available tomorrow, suggest that social networks are less safe than a year ago.</p>
<p>However, I am wondering if the fact is that the collection of its users are just more careless / stupid.</p>
<p>Security firm Sophos reckons there has been a 70% rise in attacks on social network sites, while nearly three out of four companies think workers&#8217; behaviour online puts their business at risk.</p>
<p>Three out of five users say they have been spammed via social networking sites, while one in three says they&#8217;ve been sent malware: both up around 70% on last year.</p>
<p>Worrying statistics, or proof that the increasing popularity of social networks with the less computer-literate is the reason they <em>seem</em> less secure?</p>
<p>Given that many novice computer users don&#8217;t know what firewalls and anti-virus software are, far less actually use them or practice personal safety online, it&#8217;s hardly surprising that threats seem to have increased.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that social network spam is particularly insipid, because it purports to come from someone you know. Perhaps that&#8217;s a good reason to only befriend people you trust — I know the Facebook spam I receive would never have genuinely come from those whose accounts have been compromised because it&#8217;s not in their character to try to sell me Viagra. Really.</p>
<p>Should social networks be doing more to educate users on what are real threats and what are fake? The recent &#8220;unnamed app&#8221; scare, for example, has in fact been hijacked by criminals, preying on those worried about their online security.</p>
<p>Maybe people shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to go online without knowing at least the basics of Internet safety. Yeah, OK, that&#8217;s never going to happen, but it&#8217;s a thought.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2010/02/is_social_networking_less_safe_or_are_users_more_stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone worm maker lands app development job</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/11/iphone_worm_maker_lands_app_development_job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/11/iphone_worm_maker_lands_app_development_job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ashley towns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jailbreak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=14613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ashley Towns, the hacker who developed the Ikee worm which infected / rickrolled a number of unlocked iPhones, has got himself a job with iPhone application developer Mogeneration. Security firm Sophos has reacted negatively to the news, suggesting that it glamorises the writing of potentially malicious code (despite the fact that this worm, in particular, wasn&#8217;t malicious) and arguing that there are probably more talented, law-abiding coders who could have been given the job. There are a number of issues here. Firstly, anyone who jailbreaks their iPhone is opening themselves up to a greater risk of malware and other undesired software, particularly if they don&#8217;t bother to do basic housekeeping]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/media/2009/10/iphonecostumes.jpg"><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/iphonecostumes-223x131.jpg" alt="iphonecostumes 223x131 iPhone worm maker lands app development job" title="iphonecostumes" width="223" height="131" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-14269" /></a>Ashley Towns, the hacker who developed the Ikee worm which infected / rickrolled a number of unlocked iPhones, has got himself a job with iPhone application developer Mogeneration.</p>
<p>Security firm Sophos has reacted negatively to the news, suggesting that it glamorises the writing of potentially malicious code (despite the fact that this worm, in particular, wasn&#8217;t malicious) and arguing that there are probably more talented, law-abiding coders who could have been given the job.</p>
<p>There are a number of issues here. Firstly, anyone who jailbreaks their iPhone is opening themselves up to a greater risk of malware and other undesired software, particularly if they don&#8217;t bother to do basic housekeeping tasks such as changing default passwords.</p>
<p><span id="more-14613"></span></p>
<p>Secondly, many organisations already hire hackers, because (whatever you think of them) there&#8217;s no denying they have talents that perhaps standard programmers and security staff don&#8217;t have.</p>
<p>Towns may not be the most proficient programmer, but is it really surprising that he&#8217;s been hired? It&#8217;s all publicity for the developer, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/11/iphone_worm_maker_lands_app_development_job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>False sense of security with Data Locker hard drive?</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/09/false_sense_of_security_with_data_locker_hard_drive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/09/false_sense_of_security_with_data_locker_hard_drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data locker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=13956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This hard drive may look fairly secure, being all rugged and fitted with a touchscreen for entering a numerical passcode to unlock the drive, but is it really that secure? It may well thwart the casual thief who, unable to simply plug it in to a spare USB port and peruse your precious porn stash data like it were a thumb drive, but anyone who really wants to get at your data probably isn’t going to have much trouble. Adam left a comment on the original blog post, suggesting that the way the drive is constructed makes it highly likely that the AES key is stored on a non-volatile memory]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/data-locker-hard-drive.jpg"><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/data-locker-hard-drive.jpg" alt="data locker hard drive False sense of security with Data Locker hard drive?" title="data-locker-hard-drive" width="201" height="265" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-13957" /></a>This hard drive may <em>look</em> fairly secure, being all rugged and fitted with a touchscreen for entering a numerical passcode to unlock the drive, but is it really that secure?</p>
<p>It may well thwart the casual thief who, unable to simply plug it in to a spare USB port and peruse your precious <strike>porn stash</strike> data like it were a thumb drive, but anyone who really wants to get at your data probably isn’t going to have much trouble.</p>
<p><span id="more-13956"></span></p>
<p>Adam left a comment on the <a href="http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/09/07/keep-your-data-safe-with-a-data-locker-drive/">original blog post</a>, suggesting that the way the drive is constructed makes it highly likely that the AES key is stored on a non-volatile memory chip on the circuit board.</p>
<p>This could well be desoldered and read in order to discover the code and hence grab the data.</p>
<p>Everyday consumers may well be lulled into a false sense of security, while geeks with other geeks for friends (or, indeed, enemies) will probably steer well clear of the device in the first place.</p>
<p>Adam also maintains that most people won’t be able to remember an 18-digit numerical code (apart from Pi, perhaps, which could well be the geeky version of using “1234” as a PIN), though the unit does include the alpha equivalents (much like a phone keypad) so you could spell out a word or phrase instead.</p>
<p>I think true physical security of external hard drives is more important. The Data Locker drive, which comes in 160GB, 320GB and 500GB capacities, does have a self-destruct mode if it detects a brute-force attack — however that pretty much means you’ll need <em>another</em> hard drive to back this one up, in case your data is destroyed by meddlesome fingers.</p>
<p>If you want one you can get it <a href="http://originstorage.com/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/09/false_sense_of_security_with_data_locker_hard_drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Norton cool enough to have its own comic book?</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/06/is_norton_cool_enough_to_have_its_own_comic_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/06/is_norton_cool_enough_to_have_its_own_comic_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dept. of WTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=12866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Norton, purveyor of Internet security products, is trying to be cool with the introduction of its own online comic book series set in the city of Netropolis: &#8220;While you&#8217;re visiting, there is something you need to know to survive in Netropolis. There are no police here; no Emergency Services. You are alone in this city of darkness and light, alone and vulnerable. That is why we built Norton HQ &#8211; a beacon of security against the dangers lurking around every corner. A place you can trust when you come to Netropolis, a place where someone will watch over you.&#8221; Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but I get the feeling that, in general,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis.png"><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-223x201.png" alt="norton netropolis 223x201 Is Norton cool enough to have its own comic book?" title="norton-netropolis" width="223" height="201" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-12867" /></a>Norton, purveyor of Internet security products, is trying to be cool with the introduction of its own <a href="http://emea.norton.com/global/hero/comic/uk/">online comic book series</a> set in the city of Netropolis:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;While you&#8217;re visiting, there is something you need to know to survive in Netropolis. There are no police here; no Emergency Services. You are alone in this city of darkness and light, alone and vulnerable.</p>
<p>That is why we built Norton HQ &#8211; a beacon of security against the dangers lurking around every corner. A place you can trust when you come to Netropolis, a place where someone will watch over you.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-12866"></span></p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but I get the feeling that, in general, those for whom comics in this genre will appeal already know about computer security, and as likely aren&#8217;t using Norton products.</p>
<p>What do you think? Take a look at some pics of Norton&#8217;s &#8220;we&#8217;re trying so hard not to be corporate&#8221; comic:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-1.png"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-1.png" alt="norton netropolis comic 1 Is Norton cool enough to have its own comic book?" title="norton-netropolis-comic-1" width="336" height="469" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-12868" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-2.png"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-2-223x133.png" alt="norton netropolis comic 2 223x133 Is Norton cool enough to have its own comic book?" title="norton-netropolis-comic-2" width="223" height="133" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-12869" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-3.png"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-3-223x176.png" alt="norton netropolis comic 3 223x176 Is Norton cool enough to have its own comic book?" title="norton-netropolis-comic-3" width="223" height="176" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-12870" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-4.png"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-4-223x134.png" alt="norton netropolis comic 4 223x134 Is Norton cool enough to have its own comic book?" title="norton-netropolis-comic-4" width="223" height="134" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-12871" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-5.png"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-5-223x148.png" alt="norton netropolis comic 5 223x148 Is Norton cool enough to have its own comic book?" title="norton-netropolis-comic-5" width="223" height="148" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-12872" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-6.png"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/norton-netropolis-comic-6-222x87.png" alt="norton netropolis comic 6 222x87 Is Norton cool enough to have its own comic book?" title="norton-netropolis-comic-6" width="222" height="87" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-12873" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/06/is_norton_cool_enough_to_have_its_own_comic_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dealing With Laptop Theft</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/dealing_with_laptop_theft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/dealing_with_laptop_theft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noemi Twigg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=11427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank goodness that I have not had to face this situation, and I am frantically crossing ALL of my fingers (if that&#8217;s even possible) that I would not have to find myself in such a bind &#8211; ever! Losing a laptop is not a remote possibility &#8211; it is an all-too-real possibility these days. While I am sure that you are quite vigilant when you have your laptop with you, you never know what might happen. One second you might be playing with your baby and the next, it might be gone! With Front Door Software&#8217;s Retriever, you can increase your chances of getting your laptop back in case it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11428" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/talklap-222x150.jpg" alt="talklap 222x150 Dealing With Laptop Theft" width="222" height="150" title="Dealing With Laptop Theft" />Thank goodness that I have not had to face this situation, and I am frantically crossing ALL of my fingers (if that&#8217;s even possible) that I would not have to find myself in such a bind &#8211; ever! Losing a laptop is not a remote possibility &#8211; it is an all-too-real possibility these days. While I am sure that you are quite vigilant when you have your laptop with you, you never know what might happen. One second you might be playing with your baby and the next, it might be gone!<span id="more-11427"></span><br />
With <a href="http://frontdoorsoftware.com/">Front Door Software&#8217;s Retriever</a>, you can increase your chances of getting your laptop back in case it is stolen. This is what they promise:</p>
<blockquote><p>1) Prevent theft of your laptop<br />
2) Protect your information<br />
3) Recover lost &amp; stolen equipment<br />
4) Protection 24/7 online and off<br />
5) New TALKING help feature!<br />
6) Google map / track feature</p></blockquote>
<p>While all of those things are very important, I find myself being hooked on a series of images in my head&#8230;My laptop gets stolen. I report it. The thief can&#8217;t wait to try using it. He goes to the nearest free WiFi hotspot, turns the laptop on, and suddenly, this booming voice (Aslan&#8217;s voice in The Chronicles of Narnia) is heard. I haven&#8217;t come up with the perfect &#8220;You&#8217;re a thief, return my laptop&#8221; line yet but can you just imagine how hilarious it would be to actually witness something like this happening?</p>
<p>Joking aside, this kind of security measure is something that I think will become more widespread in the very near future. You can actually try out the Retriever for free for 90 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/dealing_with_laptop_theft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The geeky &quot;peephole&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/the_geeky_peephole/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/the_geeky_peephole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=11377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah did I get your attention with the post title? Nah, this is not that post&#8230; rather a security post for your home, or your apartment. It&#8217;s the geeky way to see who&#8217;s outside knocking to get in. I use a traditional peephole and there are times I couldn&#8217;t even recognize who&#8217;s on the other side. I have to squint uncomfortably to check the person out. Oh there are times even the wife (with groceries at hand) had to wait for a good ten seconds before I open the door. The Digital Door Viewer ? (US$399) is heaven sent&#8230; specially for the sight-challenged elderly. This is an electronic video system]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-11378" title="detailfamilytmp" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/detailfamilytmp-223x223.jpg" alt="detailfamilytmp 223x223 The geeky &quot;peephole&quot;" width="223" height="223" />Ah did I get your attention with the post title? Nah, this is not that post&#8230; rather a security post for your home, or your apartment. It&#8217;s the geeky way to see who&#8217;s outside knocking to get in. I use a traditional peephole and there are times I couldn&#8217;t even recognize who&#8217;s on the other side. I have to squint uncomfortably to check the person out. Oh there are times even the wife (with groceries at hand) had to wait for a good ten seconds before I open the door.</p>
<p><span id="more-11377"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.frontgate.com/jump.jsp?itemID=19781&amp;itemType=PRODUCT&amp;path=1%2C2%2C602%2C1798&amp;iProductID=19781">The Digital Door Viewer ?</a> (US$399) is heaven sent&#8230; specially for the sight-challenged elderly. This is an electronic video system designed to replace common door viewers and peephole viewing tubes. The Digital Door Viewer delivers on-demand, high quality images, and is totally integrated and self-contained.</p>
<p>Runs on 8 AA sized batteries and is completely self-contained, doesn&#8217;t require any wires or &#8220;special connections&#8221; at all. It&#8217;s easily installed as the standard peephole as all the tools you need would be a powerdrill, a sander and possibly a light hammer too. If you think it&#8217;s an eyesore outside, you&#8217;d be glad to know that it is JUST the size of a regular peephole too. Yup&#8230; the world outside thinks it&#8217;s a regular peephole while you enjoy its digital glory.</p>
<p>The LCD panel mounted on the inside of the door has a 5-3/5&#8243; viewing area in an 8-1/2&#8243;W x 5-1/2&#8243;H frame. On the outside, the camera is mounted in a flat circular housing with just a 3/4&#8243; diameter. And it can fit any regular/standard doors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/03/the_geeky_peephole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$250,000 Bounty For Downadup/Conficker Virus Creator</title>
		<link>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/250000_bounty_for_downadupconficker_virus_creator_/</link>
		<comments>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/250000_bounty_for_downadupconficker_virus_creator_/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noemi Twigg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forevergeek.com/?p=10616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who wants $250,000?  I sure do!  Off the top of my head, I can name more things than I can count that I can do with that much money.  This amount &#8211; £172,000 – is actually well within your reach IF you know the person behind the Conficker worm.  This worm started circulating in October of 2008 and has since then infected countless computers – we’re talking of millions here – all over the world. So you might be wondering who would be so mad that he would be willing to give that much money away…take a guess?  You probably didn’t have to think much.  Who else would be so]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: left; padding: 4px; margin: 0 7px 2px 0;'  class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-10617" src="http://www.forevergeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/computer_worm-223x227.jpg" alt="computer worm 223x227 $250,000 Bounty For Downadup/Conficker Virus Creator" width="162" height="146" title="$250,000 Bounty For Downadup/Conficker Virus Creator" />Who wants $250,000?  I sure do!  Off the top of my head, I can name more things than I can count that I can do with that much money.  This amount &#8211; £172,000 – is actually well within your reach IF you know the person behind the <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/157876/protecting_against_the_rampant_conficker_worm.html">Conficker worm</a>.  This worm started circulating in October of 2008 and has since then infected countless computers – we’re talking of millions here – all over the world.</p>
<p><span id="more-10616"></span>So you might be wondering who would be so mad that he would be willing to give that much money away…take a guess?  You probably didn’t have to think much.  Who else would be so affected by a worm?  The software giant, Microsoft, has always been prone to attacks from such malware and sees the Conficker as a “criminal attack.”  According to George Stathakopulos of the company’s Trustworthy Computing Group, “<em>people who write this malware have to be held accountable</em>.”  Hence the reward for whoever could find the person behind the worm.</p>
<p>I doubt that you have not heard of the worm before but for the benefit of those who might not have, Conficker takes advantage of computers which are not updated with regard to Windows security patches.  It is a self-replicating program and can infect computers via the Internet or those innocent looking USB sticks you use on a daily basis.  And once the worm has found its way to your hard drive, it is quite hard to remove as it immediately finds ways to burrow a hole and set up defences to keep itself safe.  Once set up, the worm can be used to steal data, among other things.</p>
<p>Now back to the reward.  Do you think that they will ever catch the perps this time?  Remember, they still have rewards up in the air for the creators of three other worms &#8211; <strong>Blaster, MyDoom and Sobig.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forevergeek.com/2009/02/250000_bounty_for_downadupconficker_virus_creator_/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

